I've just barely gotten started, still groping around to see the lay of the land. I got an OpenVox A1200P with 3 each FXO and FXS modules so I can start with duplicating the current home setup with the current phones. I installed Trixbox 2.8.0.3 from the newest stable ISO.
I have s private network here (192.168.0.0/24) and a DMZ network (209.166.88.48/28) where a couple of my public servers live. Any IP phones I get should connect directly from the private network to eliminate traffic through the firewall. Obviously, any outbound connections should be, and remote access to voicemail has to be, on the public side. So I put eth0 in at 192.168.0.6 and eth1 at 209.166.88.51.
When I look in the admin console, which so far only is visible on the private address, PBX | Settings shows that there is a second NIC but System | Network doesn't show any information about eth1 at all, only that it exists. I can't even ping the outside address either from the private network or from a remote datacenter. When I run a traceroute to yahoo.com from the trixbox it goes out through the private network before it gets to the cloud.
I think I can badger CentOS into making both NICs active, but can I get trixbox to deal with both ports as appropriate, and if so, how?
Actually, there is what looks like a valid /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth1 file, with the correct address, but it seems to be ignored. When I enter "route add default gw 209.166.88.62" I get "SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable", something I've never seen before. That tells me that somebody is clamping down on that port.
No, I do not want any routing through the box! I just want both interfaces to be active and used as appropriate. Is this possible, or do I have to do Asterisk from source to get this working?
Van

Member Since:
2010-02-14